Investment Banking Procurement – The Current Trends and Innovation

By: Ankit Sood

 

 

 

The good news, though long overdue, is that procurement is quietly finding pride of place at many investment banks as a top-tier organization-wide process capable of architecting long-term value for the firms at large in the mid-to-long term. The spend under management at a lot of investment firms is nearly 25-30%, which is all the more reason why procurement should no longer remain a transactional function. That said, CPOs in the sector have quite an uphill task ahead before they can realize the fruits of strategic procurement. Firstly, banks must shake off the legacy and tyranny of near-obsolete computing systems and hit top gear in their journey toward digital automation. While these are probably the best of times for procurement, self-limiting behaviors might well be holding back the function from reaching full fruition. So, a mindset shift from transactional to strategic is highly desirable. Finally, given the competitive pressures, banks can’t afford to let the benefits of outsourcing slip through their fingers. At the same time, concerns about third-party data risks could put a dampener on their outsourcing plans. Keep reading to stay on track with investment banking industry trends.

 

Unburdening banks of money-guzzling legacy systems:

 

Banks process trillions of dollars every day, and most of these transactions happen via antiquated computing systems, which have been around for more than three decades now and no longer have enough maintenance and support. The case is no different with the investment banking sector, and market participants are struggling to integrate legacy systems with latter day enterprise apps and get them to “talk” to each other. However, digital technology is permeating every sector without exception, and the leadership at investment firms know they cannot remain impervious to change. With born-digital investment services nibbling at the market, incumbent investment bankers are hurrying to embrace AI, ML, virtual “deal rooms,” and blockchain to give a new fillip to their activities, from consulting to investment banking.

 

Shifting from the transactional to the strategic in banking procurement:

 

As mentioned earlier, banks have realized some degree of success in sourcing technology and operational support from a single supplier or a few suppliers, and such bundling translates to lower total costs and enhanced service quality. However, expecting this bundled approach to work across all categories is asking a bit too much. In reality, not many suppliers can ramp up quickly and deliver on a scale in response to consolidated purchase orders. The resulting supplier performance issues, such as late deliveries, back orders, fluctuating lead times and incorrect shipments, are financially draining banks, not to speak of the reputational impact on the brand. Suffice to say that CPOs in consulting or investment banking must actively embrace a holistic approach to enterprise spend, since the prevailing narrow field of view on procurement is limiting its capability to rein in costs and improve bottom lines.

 

Addressing growing customer data risks from third parties:

 

Many of the Big-10 investment banks (like JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs) routinely hire staff in more cost-efficient countries in Asia and Eastern Europe to run critical back-office functions and operate call centers. In early 2022, JP Morgan Chase announced it was hiring nearly 6,000 people in India in areas like AI/ML, cybersecurity, cloud architecture, and data engineering. In the nearly two decades up to 2023, Goldman Sachs’ presence in India has gone from 300 people in IT and operations to 8,000 employees in tech, risk management, and investment banking advisory. Well Fargo’s 4,800-strong facility in the Philippines takes care of technology, operations, and knowledge services. Outsourcing often helps address critical skill shortages. Sometime back, Goldman Sachs was planning to outsource 1,000 high-paying roles in sales and investment banking to Singapore. The cost benefits of outsourcing are compelling, and peer pressure is drawing more businesses toward the practice. Nevertheless, there are concerns, not entirely misplaced, that sensitive information (e.g., social security number) might be shared offshore, handled by overseas staff, or end up in the hands of online crooks.

 

How these current procurement trends play a strategic role in investment banking

 

 

 

 

 

Enhance investment banking for the digital era:

 

Historically, investing in state-of-the-art IT infrastructure has never really been top of mind for decision makers in the investment banking segment, but now they seem keen on making amends. To stay competitive and deliver consistently great customer service every single time, these firms are investing in relationship management platforms. With such “CRM for investment banking” in place, support teams get a centralized view of every interaction they have with a customer, and this helps them sharpen their focus on the customer and improve conversion rates. Meanwhile, the sales force gets leads, deadlines, and reminder alerts, all sorted and neatly organized, thanks to the software. The result is an appreciable decline in the number of potential deals falling through the crack. More and more investment bankers are leveraging AI tools to reduce cost and drive efficiency in functions like deal origination, due diligence, fraud detection, and customer service. At the same time, blockchain is showing the potential to eliminate intermediaries (such as in fund transfer), cut down the flab in functions like IT, compliance, risk management, and operations, thus paring spend by a third. Consequently, investment firms are warming up to this digital distributed ledger technology.

 

Protect and secure sensitive customer data:

 

In March 2022, Bank of New York Mellon was hit with a record fine – $11.8 million! – by Ireland’s central bank for as many as 16 regulatory breaches, besides its failure to notify clients before kicking off outsourcing deals. In the light of expanding regulatory mandates, stakeholders want banks, in general, to take charge of their outsourcing activities. The interests of investment banks are best served by keeping the bulk of core functions, ranging from investment banking to consulting, in-house – since outsourcing these to an excess carries the risk of overreliance on a supplier or geographic location (the so-called concentration risk). On the other hand, banks must consider proactively shipping non-core functions (IT, operations, research support) to cost-efficient operators to be able to reap the benefits of not just cost arbitrage but also improved productivity and expanded talent pools. Banks must ensure unequivocal agreements on data confidentiality and integrity are baked into outsourcing contracts, with hefty penalties for compromising customer privacy. Where customer data is handled outside the home country, financial institutions must be honest and upfront with customers on this – rather than leaving such details tucked away in the fine print of the bank’s terms of agreement.

 

Take a long view on banking procurement – it’s about time:

 

Essentially, the procurement organization at an investment bank must strive to seamlessly map segmented category-wise views of spend with forecasts of future demand and, furthermore, with the requirements of specific projects. Category management, demand planning, and project purchasing call for distinct skillsets, and a narrow focus on personnel with financial services expertise is no guarantee of success anymore. Bringing in the most desirable talent with demonstrated expertise in diverse industry groups (e.g., investment banking risk management, supplier management) and, further on, building on their knowledge and skillsets through continuous learning programs is essential to move the procurement function at investment banks up the value chain. “Procurement Maturity” is a demanding peak to ascend, but if scaled, the procurement organization will not just be able to understand and track spend as well as keep costs under control, but also ensure core procurement activities get all of its attention. With this, the procurement team should be able to drive lasting value across the enterprise.

 

One stop solution – How SpendEdge can help to transform your investment banking business with procurement and sourcing market intelligence?

 

 

The technology space is dramatically evolving, so much so that businesses are struggling to stay up to date. Our experts help businesses choose the right technology to enable investment banking consulting from the myriad of trending platforms out there, keeping in mind their long-term needs, cost considerations, and sustainability agenda. We make sure these technologies are viable over the longer term, besides ensuring their compatibility with incumbent systems.

 

Address third-party data risks as a priority:

 

An unhealthy obsession with supplier costs has many businesses chasing low-cost vendors who often cut corners on due diligence compliance. Unscrupulous third-party supply chain participants constitute the biggest source of reputational risk in investment banking outsourcing. Cost can never be a sole consideration for reckoning supplier risks, so taking a more detailed view of potential risks, including data risks, we assign accurate risk scores to suppliers.

 

Catapult the procurement function to strategic heights:

 

Contrary to popular perception, sourcing can never be the “purchasing at the lowest cost” function. Over the years, our experts have elevated sourcing to its true status – that of a strategic and organization-wide process capable of delivering best-value goods and services to businesses when they need them while staying within budget. By so doing, we leverage investment banking analytics to provide businesses with the much-needed competitive advantage, going several extra miles beyond procurement efficiency improvements.

 

Success Stories: SpendEdge helped investment banking client untap value with market intelligence and save procurement costs

 

Our client, a midsize American investment banking advisory, was facing competitive pressures in the home market, which threatened to hurt margins. Having seen peers outsourcing resource-intensive operations to cost-friendly destinations, the client hoped to emulate their example. While the client didn’t want to miss out on the cost advantages promised by outsourcing, potential risks to confidential customer data from third parties were weighing heavily on the client. Besides, consolidating operations with a third-party vendor might give rise to concentration risks, which was another major concern. After a full due diligence, the client began to work with our experts to resolve the raft of business issues it faced. And at stake was a considerably large addressable market in investment banking.

Applying our market research methodology, brought to perfection over nearly two decades, our team evaluated the client’s business requirements and identified several third-party business process outsourcing services (BPOs) in cost-effective locations like India and the Philippines. Our procurement specialists weighed in several factors and most of all, data security practices of these BPOs. The providers were shortlisted based on critical data security credentials (e.g., ISO certification, data security policies, multi-layer data security, customer and compliance protocols). This apart, our experts factored in the BPOs’ years of experience, credentials, delivery results, and fiscal stability. To sail clear of concentration risks, our experts recommended that the client retain most of its core functions in-house rather than ship these offshore. Furthermore, our specialists validated and tabulated research findings to narrow down to a shortlist of five BPOs. The timing was important for the client, and our team quickly wrapped up the entire exercise. The client has started working with one of the BPOs on our shortlist on a test project and early results are very encouraging.

 

Digitally transforming an investment bank’s procurement function can be easy as pie or frustratingly hard. It all boils down to who you are talking to and the experience and expertise in procurement transformation they bring to the table. To find out more on how you can digitally enable your procurement function, talk to our experts now.

 

 

 

FAQ’s

 

What is procurement process harmonization?

It is the process of identifying, consolidating, and prioritizing the business’ procurement needs over the longer term.

 

What are the investment banking procurement categories?

Direct, indirect, goods and services.

 

What are the solution offerings for the investment banking industry?

Solutions focused on core business activities, pinpointing critical spend with high accuracy (versus non-critical spend), and consistently improving spend tracking.